Authors: Issam Najm, Brian Gallagher, Nikhil Vishwanath, Nicole Blute, Alexander Gorzalski, Adam Feffer, Sarah Richardson
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/aws2.1245
Synopsis:
- Novel clay-based adsorbent, FLUORO-SORB® 200 Adsorbent, was compared to three bituminous coal-based GAC adsorbents using RSSCT’s on contaminated groundwater samples to compare removal efficiency and media life determinations, overall FLUORO-SORB® Adsorbent had a significantly higher affinity for PFAS than GAC
- FLUORO-SORB® Adsorbent treated 2x more water (136 gal) than GAC (71 gal), with a lower simulated EBCT (2 min) than that required for treatment with GAC (7.5 min)
- Based on the shorter EBCT and media cost per pound (can we add a number here and cite it to disprove the papers claim on FS cost vs GAC) FLUORO-SORB® has a lower capital and operational cost compared to GAC
Brief: RSSCT testing showed FLUORO-SORB® 200 Adsorbent to have superior PFAS affinity, operate at lower EBCTs, and have a greater capacity for PFAS than commonly used GAC sorbents. Additionally, due to the comparable cost per weight, FLUORO-SORB® 200 Adsorbent is said to also have a lower capital and operational cost than GAC
